Lien Review

Lien Review is a self-hostable GitHub Action that reviews pull requests: complexity analysis, an agent-driven bug review, and a PR summary — posted back to GitHub as inline comments and workflow annotations. There's no server, no database, and no recurring bill: the action clones the PR by SHA, reviews it, and writes results straight to GitHub using the workflow's built-in GITHUB_TOKEN.

This page covers setup. For the complete input/output reference, fork-PR handling, and security notes, see packages/action/README.md in the repo.

Quick start

Add a workflow at .github/workflows/lien-review.yml:

name: Lien Review

on:
  pull_request:

permissions:
  contents: read
  pull-requests: write

jobs:
  review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: getlien/lien-review@v1
        with:
          openrouter-api-key: ${{ secrets.OPENROUTER_API_KEY }}

That single uses: line is the whole integration — no actions/checkout step is needed. Lien self-clones the PR head (and base, for complexity deltas) by SHA using the same token.

Required permissions

The workflow must grant these or the comment writes will 403:

permissions:
  contents: read # clone the PR head/base by SHA
  pull-requests: write # post inline review comments

LLM key setup

The agent (bug) review needs an LLM key, provided as a workflow secret:

1. Get an OpenRouter API key (preferred — runs OpenRouter's calibrated default model, currently moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code; see packages/review/src/defaults.ts for the source of truth) or an Anthropic API key.
2. Add it under Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions → New repository secret as OPENROUTER_API_KEY (or ANTHROPIC_API_KEY).
3. Pass it through the action's with: block, as shown above.

If both keys are omitted, the review still runs but complexity-only — the agent bug/summary/architectural passes are skipped.

Cost: a typical PR review costs roughly $0.02–$0.15 in OpenRouter tokens on the default model (measured across the 2026-07 cross-repo study; ~$0.03/vote median, with complex multi-pass reviews at the high end — OpenRouter's own billing can run ~1.5–2× the harness-reported figure). The exact cost of every run is printed in the job's step summary.

What it checks

Feature	Description
Complexity analysis	Flags new/worsened cyclomatic, cognitive, and Halstead complexity violations
Agent bug review	LLM-driven review for correctness bugs (OpenRouter or Anthropic)
PR summary	A concise summary of the change, posted as a step summary
Advisory by default	fail-on: never — the check never blocks a PR unless you opt in

Advanced configuration

One behavior is tunable only via an environment variable on the action step, not a formal input: set LIEN_REVIEW_DOC_PASS=0 to disable the dedicated doc-truth second pass that checks documentation/guidance prose against the code it describes (on by default, and only runs on PRs touching doc surfaces). There is currently no model input — the OpenRouter path pins the calibrated default deliberately, since the calibration evidence backing this review only covers that one model. See packages/action/README.md for details.

Blocking a PR on the review

By default the review is advisory — it never fails CI. To gate merges on it, set fail-on: error (or any) and mark the workflow's job as a Required status check in your branch protection rules. See the inputs table for the full set of options (threshold, review-types, block-on-new-errors, fail-on).

If the agent review's main pass never runs at all (every LLM provider request failed), Lien marks the result with an error-severity finding and a failure conclusion instead of a clean-looking review, so a starved run is never mistaken for "no issues found." See packages/action/README.md for the full behavior, including how it interacts with fail-on.

Fork PRs

On a pull_request event from a fork, GitHub forces the built-in GITHUB_TOKEN to read-only, so Lien can still review the code but can't post inline comments (findings still show up as workflow annotations and in the step summary). To get inline comments on fork PRs, opt into the pull_request_target variant documented in packages/action/README.md — read the security note there first.

Relationship to the MCP tools

Lien Review is a separate product surface from the MCP tools: the MCP tools run locally inside your AI assistant, while Lien Review runs in CI against a pull request. Both share the same underlying AST parsing and complexity analysis (@liendev/parser), but Lien Review needs no local index and no lien init — it's a drop-in GitHub Action.